Mar 11, 2025
Liz Elfman
Content Marketing Director
07
Best practices for data access governance
1.
Implement a data classification system
2.
Establish clear policies and procedures
3.
Embrace agile data governance
4.
Conduct regular access reviews and audits
5.
Implement the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP)
6.
Automate access request
7.
Provide ongoing training
8.
Implement strong authentication methods
9.
Monitor and log access activities
Data access governance makes policies that ensure designated people have access to their relevant assets in an organization’s data governance framework. It's a part of the broader data governance strategy, which sets standards to manage and protect data across an organization. Primarily, data access governance focuses on:
Security to prevent breaches and insider threats
Compliance to meet regulations like GDPR and HIPAA
Efficiency to streamline access controls and audits
Data democratization to allow authorized users to access necessary data without bottlenecks
For example, banks enforce strict access controls in finance so only authorized employees can handle transaction data.
When employees have unnecessary access to sensitive data, you leave the door wide open for problems. 83% of organizations experienced at least one insider attack in the past year. This shows insiders with too much access may steal confidential information or accidentally leak it.
In fact, over-access (when teams have more access than necessary) can cause some serious issues. In 2020, a misconfigured AWS S3 bucket exposed the personal and payment data of 7 million BHIM app users. This data was stored unencrypted in a publicly accessible bucket, which left it vulnerable to fraud and theft.
This is why you need a well-implemented data access governance to protect your and your customers’s data by restricting access to only essential users — otherwise you're more likely to experience data breaches and fail compliance audits.
Since data access governance is a smart way to control who can see and use data assets, it overcomes the risks of poor governance in three main ways:
Provides stronger security: Limits access to only authorized personnel to reduce the attack surface and prevent data leaks.
Improves operational efficiency: Automates access controls and workflows to decrease manual approval bottlenecks so only the right employees can access the data when needed.
Simplifies regulatory compliance: Keeps detailed logs of all data access to prove to auditors that you follow the required regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX, depending on your industry.
Data access governance imposes regulatory frameworks to set strict access controls and protect sensitive data from unauthorized use. Let’s look at some of these key frameworks:
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) law mandates strict access controls to protect the personal data of EU citizens. It has a total of 99 articles — each highlights how organizations must handle citizens' data. Let’s look at its major articles that emphasize data access governance:
Article 5: Data must be processed securely and only for specified purposes in a transparent manner.
Article 25: Organizations must embed security into their systems by default to restrict access to only those who need it.
Article 30: Businesses must maintain logs of who accesses data, when, and why — a core function of data access governance.
Article 32: Requires encryption and strict access controls to prevent unauthorized access.
Article 33: Governance tools help track who accessed what data before an incident occurred. However, organizations must notify authorities within 72 hours of a breach.
Apart from these articles, GDPR has a fundamental principle, Privacy by Design, which requires organizations to integrate data protection into their systems from the start. The whole idea of this principle is applied through data access governance as it detects and fixes access risks before they become a problem.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives consumers control over their personal information through strict requirements. Data access governance enforces these requirements as per CCPA:
Consumer data access requests: Companies must be able to identify and retrieve personal data when consumers request.
Right to know (CIV 1798.110): Businesses must track and report who accessed consumer data and for what purpose.
Right to deletion (CIV 1798.105): Access controls ensure deleted consumer data is no longer accessible.
Prevent unauthorized sharing (Section 1798.120): Role-based access ensures that only authorized personnel handle consumer data to reduce the risks of improper sharing.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) applies strict access control requirements to protect electronic protected health information (ePHI) in healthcare. Data access governance supports HIPAA compliance by:
Implementing role-based access (45 CFR § 164.308): Ensures that only authorized healthcare providers can access patient medical records.
Audit controls (45 CFR § 164.312): Organizations must log and monitor who accesses patient data and review logs for suspicious activity.
Access monitoring (45 CFR § 164.312(a)(1)): Requires continuous monitoring to detect unauthorized access to health data.
Minimum necessary standard (45 CFR § 164.502(b)): Limits data exposure to the minimum necessary for an employee’s role.
Although GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA are the most well-known regulations, we also have other regulations for different industries. So let’s see what are they:
GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act): Requires financial institutions to enforce access controls to protect customer financial information from unauthorized access.
SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act): Mandates access control policies for financial records to prevent fraud and insider threats.
PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard): Implements strict access control measures for companies handling credit card transactions.
Apart from following global data compliance regulations, detailed audit logs are also necessary to maintain compliance and investigate security breaches. Audit trails are detailed records that store key data like login details, IP addresses, timestamps, and any activity that’s done to show who did what and when.
For example, when auditors require proof of data access controls, we can use these logs to show proper protocols were followed. On the contrary, if a security breach occurs, these logs help identify how it happened and what steps must be taken to prevent future incidents.
Data access governance relies on a combination of well-defined policies, structured procedures, advanced technologies, and the involvement of the right people. These elements work together to ensure that data is accessed securely and in line with organizational and regulatory requirements.
The three main principles of data access governance are:
Principle of least privilege: Only grant the minimum access necessary for users to perform their jobs because over-access increases security risks and compliance violations.
Role-based access control (RBAC): Instead of assigning permissions to people, RBAC groups users into roles based on their job functions. This simplifies access management and reduces human error.
Continuous monitoring: Real-time monitoring is done to keep an eye on access patterns so any insider threats or potential security breaches are discovered before they can cause harm.
Together, these principles form the foundation of data access governance. However, with these principles, data classification is equally important — it labels data based on sensitivity and enforces appropriate access controls.
There are some common challenges that organizations face on their way toward establishing full-fledged data access governance. Some of the most common problems are:
Many organizations rely on outdated legacy systems that don’t support modern access governance. These systems lack integration capabilities so it’s challenging to implement centralized security policies.
As a result, they create data silos (where information is stored in separate, disconnected systems) which prevents a unified view of access permissions and data security. It's then difficult to enforce consistent access policies.
As organizations contribute to the 149 zettabytes of data generated in 2024, governing access has become more complex. This is because multiple systems create thousands or millions of data access requests that are not easy to handle. This, in return, may leave room for security vulnerabilities. In the past year alone, over 30,000 vulnerabilities were reported — a 17% jump from the year before. That’s why we need scalable data governance tools to overcome these issues.
There’s a constant clash between keeping data secure and making sure people can easily access the information they need. If security is too strict, it slows down work. If it’s too loose, it opens the door to risks. So, organizations must find the right balance between both.
Laws like GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, and SOX require businesses to update access governance policies continuously. When new regulations emerge, compliance becomes a moving target for organizations, which they can’t miss as it results in hefty fines. For example, Anthem had to pay $16 million to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to settle a data breach that violated HIPAA implementation.
New data access governance systems often require employees to change their workflows and adopt new technologies. People tend to stick to what they know, and if a new system seems complicated and limits their usual access to data, they may push back.
This resistance is the main reason behind poor adoption rates. In fact, 39% of employees feel resistant to change due to a lack of understanding about why the change is happening. To overcome this, organizations must invest in communication and guidance about change and make sure the system is user-friendly. Doing so will promote a culture of security awareness and data management.
We can resolve most data access governance challenges with the right tools and technologies. So, make sure you have the following tools in your toolkit:
A data catalog is a centralized inventory of an organization’s data, which shows complete visibility into what data exists and who has access to it. It defines key attributes like data classification, security policies, and ownership.
On average, employees spend 9.3 hours per week — searching for information. Data catalogs reduce this time to help professionals quickly find and access the needed data. It also tracks data lineage to show how data moves through systems.
Automation tools make security smarter and more reliable. They apply access controls consistently, which reduces the risk of compliance violations. AI and machine learning take this further by analyzing user behavior and adjusting access based on real-time risk assessments.
For example, an automated workflow can quickly approve low-risk access requests, while high-risk requests trigger additional verification steps or require manager approval.
Effective access governance relies on a mix of technologies to maintain data security and access for everyone. Some of these widely-used tools include:
Data masking and encryption tools: They protect sensitive information with encrypted data so it is unreadable to unauthorized users.
Access management platforms: They enforce role-based controls, multi-factor authentication, and just-in-time access to prevent over-permissions and insider threats.
Governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) software: They help organizations stay audit-ready by tracking access logs and ensuring regulatory compliance.
For these tools to work appropriately, they must connect well with your databases, applications, cloud services, and identity management systems. This way, they can create a comprehensive framework to protect data while still making it available to those who need it.
Now that you know how data access governance works, let’s look at some best practices to maintain security and efficiency.
A good data classification system helps you apply the right level of protection to different types of data. So start by categorizing data into public, internal, confidential, and restricted levels. For each category:
Define what types of data belong in each class.
Document the handling requirements for each level.
Consider both regulatory requirements and business value when classifying.
Define who can access which data, under what conditions, and for how long. Write these policies in simple language and include specific examples to illustrate proper application. To make this process easier for teams, you can even create templates for common access scenarios and document the rationale behind each policy.
However, don’t create overly complex policies that are difficult to follow and do not align with regulatory requirements.
Agile data governance adapts traditional governance principles to new environments by introducing iterative improvements instead of massive policy overhauls. And instead of delaying reviews, it promotes regular review cycles to evaluate and adjust governance approaches in a timely manner.
To implement this, create governance sprints with specific goals you want to achieve and use collaboration tools to facilitate quick feedback and decision-making.
This will help your organization quickly adjust access policies during mergers or even acquisitions. And it can quickly adapt to dynamic cloud environments where resources keep changing.
Make sure to conduct quarterly reviews for sensitive systems and annual reviews for others. To do so, you can create standardized templates and use automated tools to compare current access against job requirements. But don’t treat this process as a checkbox exercise — it’s a proper, meaningful control.
If you’re unsure where to start, use a risk-based approach and prioritize which systems to review most frequently.
The principle of least privilege ensures users have only the minimum access needed to perform their jobs. To implement this principle, start with the most sensitive systems and create a matrix mapping job function for the required access levels. This way, the PoLP can analyze job functions to determine the minimum required access and create role-based access profiles aligned with responsibilities.
Automation streamlines governance while improving security through self-service and workflow tools. But map your current process before automating access requests and start with high-volume, low-risk requests.
Your data is prone to human errors and insider threats when staff is not well trained on data management practices. So, educate your employees on access governance policies and compliance obligations. Train them through regular phishing simulations and tutorials on data access management. This will avoid any issues when they start working with the new systems.
Weak or outdated authentication methods increase the risk of unauthorized access. Early in 2022, Okta, an IAM provider, experienced a security incident linked to exploiting authentication mechanisms. This raised concerns about how even leading identity providers can be vulnerable if authentication processes are not protected against modern attack techniques.
That’s why you must strengthen access security with multi-factor authentication (MFA) or adaptive authentication. For high-risk data access, you can even implement biometric authentication as it’s more secure. Overall, your end goal should be to balance security with user experience.
Strong monitoring captures who accessed what data, when, and from where, including both successful and failed attempts. To implement this across your organization, define normal access patterns and set up automated alerts for unusual activities. However, avoid collecting too much data without adequate analysis, as this can create unnecessary noise.
Once you’ve implemented data access governance, use the following KPIs to measure its performance:
Security metrics: Tracks failed login attempts and unauthorized data access to identify potential security threats.
Time to detect and respond to incidents: Measures how quickly security teams identify and mitigate unauthorized access or breaches.
Number of audit findings: Evaluate compliance effectiveness by tracking issues identified during audits.
Time to produce compliance reports: Assesses how efficiently organizations generate reports for regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX.
Time to grant or revoke access: Measures the efficiency of provisioning and de-provisioning user access to minimize security risks.
Number of access-related tickets: Indicates potential inefficiencies in access request processes.
Survey results on ease of access: Captures employee feedback on how easily they can request and obtain the needed data.
Data findability score: Measures how users locate the right datasets through a data catalog.
data.world is a data catalog platform that implements modern governance principles. We offer an agile approach to governance that can start small and grow with your needs rather than imposing rigid controls upfront. Our cataloging features provide visibility across the entire data environment through unified metadata management, automated discovery, and lineage tracking.
In addition, we balance security with accessibility through granular permissions to reduce governance friction. This helps organizations maintain proper governance while allowing flexible, accessible data use.
Schedule a demo today if you want to transform how your organization manages data access.
Data access governance makes policies that ensure designated people have access to their relevant assets in an organization’s data governance framework. It's a part of the broader data governance strategy, which sets standards to manage and protect data across an organization. Primarily, data access governance focuses on:
Security to prevent breaches and insider threats
Compliance to meet regulations like GDPR and HIPAA
Efficiency to streamline access controls and audits
Data democratization to allow authorized users to access necessary data without bottlenecks
For example, banks enforce strict access controls in finance so only authorized employees can handle transaction data.
When employees have unnecessary access to sensitive data, you leave the door wide open for problems. 83% of organizations experienced at least one insider attack in the past year. This shows insiders with too much access may steal confidential information or accidentally leak it.
In fact, over-access (when teams have more access than necessary) can cause some serious issues. In 2020, a misconfigured AWS S3 bucket exposed the personal and payment data of 7 million BHIM app users. This data was stored unencrypted in a publicly accessible bucket, which left it vulnerable to fraud and theft.
This is why you need a well-implemented data access governance to protect your and your customers’s data by restricting access to only essential users — otherwise you're more likely to experience data breaches and fail compliance audits.
Since data access governance is a smart way to control who can see and use data assets, it overcomes the risks of poor governance in three main ways:
Provides stronger security: Limits access to only authorized personnel to reduce the attack surface and prevent data leaks.
Improves operational efficiency: Automates access controls and workflows to decrease manual approval bottlenecks so only the right employees can access the data when needed.
Simplifies regulatory compliance: Keeps detailed logs of all data access to prove to auditors that you follow the required regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX, depending on your industry.
Data access governance imposes regulatory frameworks to set strict access controls and protect sensitive data from unauthorized use. Let’s look at some of these key frameworks:
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) law mandates strict access controls to protect the personal data of EU citizens. It has a total of 99 articles — each highlights how organizations must handle citizens' data. Let’s look at its major articles that emphasize data access governance:
Article 5: Data must be processed securely and only for specified purposes in a transparent manner.
Article 25: Organizations must embed security into their systems by default to restrict access to only those who need it.
Article 30: Businesses must maintain logs of who accesses data, when, and why — a core function of data access governance.
Article 32: Requires encryption and strict access controls to prevent unauthorized access.
Article 33: Governance tools help track who accessed what data before an incident occurred. However, organizations must notify authorities within 72 hours of a breach.
Apart from these articles, GDPR has a fundamental principle, Privacy by Design, which requires organizations to integrate data protection into their systems from the start. The whole idea of this principle is applied through data access governance as it detects and fixes access risks before they become a problem.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives consumers control over their personal information through strict requirements. Data access governance enforces these requirements as per CCPA:
Consumer data access requests: Companies must be able to identify and retrieve personal data when consumers request.
Right to know (CIV 1798.110): Businesses must track and report who accessed consumer data and for what purpose.
Right to deletion (CIV 1798.105): Access controls ensure deleted consumer data is no longer accessible.
Prevent unauthorized sharing (Section 1798.120): Role-based access ensures that only authorized personnel handle consumer data to reduce the risks of improper sharing.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) applies strict access control requirements to protect electronic protected health information (ePHI) in healthcare. Data access governance supports HIPAA compliance by:
Implementing role-based access (45 CFR § 164.308): Ensures that only authorized healthcare providers can access patient medical records.
Audit controls (45 CFR § 164.312): Organizations must log and monitor who accesses patient data and review logs for suspicious activity.
Access monitoring (45 CFR § 164.312(a)(1)): Requires continuous monitoring to detect unauthorized access to health data.
Minimum necessary standard (45 CFR § 164.502(b)): Limits data exposure to the minimum necessary for an employee’s role.
Although GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA are the most well-known regulations, we also have other regulations for different industries. So let’s see what are they:
GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act): Requires financial institutions to enforce access controls to protect customer financial information from unauthorized access.
SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act): Mandates access control policies for financial records to prevent fraud and insider threats.
PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard): Implements strict access control measures for companies handling credit card transactions.
Apart from following global data compliance regulations, detailed audit logs are also necessary to maintain compliance and investigate security breaches. Audit trails are detailed records that store key data like login details, IP addresses, timestamps, and any activity that’s done to show who did what and when.
For example, when auditors require proof of data access controls, we can use these logs to show proper protocols were followed. On the contrary, if a security breach occurs, these logs help identify how it happened and what steps must be taken to prevent future incidents.
Data access governance relies on a combination of well-defined policies, structured procedures, advanced technologies, and the involvement of the right people. These elements work together to ensure that data is accessed securely and in line with organizational and regulatory requirements.
The three main principles of data access governance are:
Principle of least privilege: Only grant the minimum access necessary for users to perform their jobs because over-access increases security risks and compliance violations.
Role-based access control (RBAC): Instead of assigning permissions to people, RBAC groups users into roles based on their job functions. This simplifies access management and reduces human error.
Continuous monitoring: Real-time monitoring is done to keep an eye on access patterns so any insider threats or potential security breaches are discovered before they can cause harm.
Together, these principles form the foundation of data access governance. However, with these principles, data classification is equally important — it labels data based on sensitivity and enforces appropriate access controls.
There are some common challenges that organizations face on their way toward establishing full-fledged data access governance. Some of the most common problems are:
Many organizations rely on outdated legacy systems that don’t support modern access governance. These systems lack integration capabilities so it’s challenging to implement centralized security policies.
As a result, they create data silos (where information is stored in separate, disconnected systems) which prevents a unified view of access permissions and data security. It's then difficult to enforce consistent access policies.
As organizations contribute to the 149 zettabytes of data generated in 2024, governing access has become more complex. This is because multiple systems create thousands or millions of data access requests that are not easy to handle. This, in return, may leave room for security vulnerabilities. In the past year alone, over 30,000 vulnerabilities were reported — a 17% jump from the year before. That’s why we need scalable data governance tools to overcome these issues.
There’s a constant clash between keeping data secure and making sure people can easily access the information they need. If security is too strict, it slows down work. If it’s too loose, it opens the door to risks. So, organizations must find the right balance between both.
Laws like GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, and SOX require businesses to update access governance policies continuously. When new regulations emerge, compliance becomes a moving target for organizations, which they can’t miss as it results in hefty fines. For example, Anthem had to pay $16 million to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to settle a data breach that violated HIPAA implementation.
New data access governance systems often require employees to change their workflows and adopt new technologies. People tend to stick to what they know, and if a new system seems complicated and limits their usual access to data, they may push back.
This resistance is the main reason behind poor adoption rates. In fact, 39% of employees feel resistant to change due to a lack of understanding about why the change is happening. To overcome this, organizations must invest in communication and guidance about change and make sure the system is user-friendly. Doing so will promote a culture of security awareness and data management.
We can resolve most data access governance challenges with the right tools and technologies. So, make sure you have the following tools in your toolkit:
A data catalog is a centralized inventory of an organization’s data, which shows complete visibility into what data exists and who has access to it. It defines key attributes like data classification, security policies, and ownership.
On average, employees spend 9.3 hours per week — searching for information. Data catalogs reduce this time to help professionals quickly find and access the needed data. It also tracks data lineage to show how data moves through systems.
Automation tools make security smarter and more reliable. They apply access controls consistently, which reduces the risk of compliance violations. AI and machine learning take this further by analyzing user behavior and adjusting access based on real-time risk assessments.
For example, an automated workflow can quickly approve low-risk access requests, while high-risk requests trigger additional verification steps or require manager approval.
Effective access governance relies on a mix of technologies to maintain data security and access for everyone. Some of these widely-used tools include:
Data masking and encryption tools: They protect sensitive information with encrypted data so it is unreadable to unauthorized users.
Access management platforms: They enforce role-based controls, multi-factor authentication, and just-in-time access to prevent over-permissions and insider threats.
Governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) software: They help organizations stay audit-ready by tracking access logs and ensuring regulatory compliance.
For these tools to work appropriately, they must connect well with your databases, applications, cloud services, and identity management systems. This way, they can create a comprehensive framework to protect data while still making it available to those who need it.
Now that you know how data access governance works, let’s look at some best practices to maintain security and efficiency.
A good data classification system helps you apply the right level of protection to different types of data. So start by categorizing data into public, internal, confidential, and restricted levels. For each category:
Define what types of data belong in each class.
Document the handling requirements for each level.
Consider both regulatory requirements and business value when classifying.
Define who can access which data, under what conditions, and for how long. Write these policies in simple language and include specific examples to illustrate proper application. To make this process easier for teams, you can even create templates for common access scenarios and document the rationale behind each policy.
However, don’t create overly complex policies that are difficult to follow and do not align with regulatory requirements.
Agile data governance adapts traditional governance principles to new environments by introducing iterative improvements instead of massive policy overhauls. And instead of delaying reviews, it promotes regular review cycles to evaluate and adjust governance approaches in a timely manner.
To implement this, create governance sprints with specific goals you want to achieve and use collaboration tools to facilitate quick feedback and decision-making.
This will help your organization quickly adjust access policies during mergers or even acquisitions. And it can quickly adapt to dynamic cloud environments where resources keep changing.
Make sure to conduct quarterly reviews for sensitive systems and annual reviews for others. To do so, you can create standardized templates and use automated tools to compare current access against job requirements. But don’t treat this process as a checkbox exercise — it’s a proper, meaningful control.
If you’re unsure where to start, use a risk-based approach and prioritize which systems to review most frequently.
The principle of least privilege ensures users have only the minimum access needed to perform their jobs. To implement this principle, start with the most sensitive systems and create a matrix mapping job function for the required access levels. This way, the PoLP can analyze job functions to determine the minimum required access and create role-based access profiles aligned with responsibilities.
Automation streamlines governance while improving security through self-service and workflow tools. But map your current process before automating access requests and start with high-volume, low-risk requests.
Your data is prone to human errors and insider threats when staff is not well trained on data management practices. So, educate your employees on access governance policies and compliance obligations. Train them through regular phishing simulations and tutorials on data access management. This will avoid any issues when they start working with the new systems.
Weak or outdated authentication methods increase the risk of unauthorized access. Early in 2022, Okta, an IAM provider, experienced a security incident linked to exploiting authentication mechanisms. This raised concerns about how even leading identity providers can be vulnerable if authentication processes are not protected against modern attack techniques.
That’s why you must strengthen access security with multi-factor authentication (MFA) or adaptive authentication. For high-risk data access, you can even implement biometric authentication as it’s more secure. Overall, your end goal should be to balance security with user experience.
Strong monitoring captures who accessed what data, when, and from where, including both successful and failed attempts. To implement this across your organization, define normal access patterns and set up automated alerts for unusual activities. However, avoid collecting too much data without adequate analysis, as this can create unnecessary noise.
Once you’ve implemented data access governance, use the following KPIs to measure its performance:
Security metrics: Tracks failed login attempts and unauthorized data access to identify potential security threats.
Time to detect and respond to incidents: Measures how quickly security teams identify and mitigate unauthorized access or breaches.
Number of audit findings: Evaluate compliance effectiveness by tracking issues identified during audits.
Time to produce compliance reports: Assesses how efficiently organizations generate reports for regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX.
Time to grant or revoke access: Measures the efficiency of provisioning and de-provisioning user access to minimize security risks.
Number of access-related tickets: Indicates potential inefficiencies in access request processes.
Survey results on ease of access: Captures employee feedback on how easily they can request and obtain the needed data.
Data findability score: Measures how users locate the right datasets through a data catalog.
data.world is a data catalog platform that implements modern governance principles. We offer an agile approach to governance that can start small and grow with your needs rather than imposing rigid controls upfront. Our cataloging features provide visibility across the entire data environment through unified metadata management, automated discovery, and lineage tracking.
In addition, we balance security with accessibility through granular permissions to reduce governance friction. This helps organizations maintain proper governance while allowing flexible, accessible data use.
Schedule a demo today if you want to transform how your organization manages data access.
07
Best practices for data access governance
1.
Implement a data classification system
2.
Establish clear policies and procedures
3.
Embrace agile data governance
4.
Conduct regular access reviews and audits
5.
Implement the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP)
6.
Automate access request
7.
Provide ongoing training
8.
Implement strong authentication methods
9.
Monitor and log access activities
Get the best practices, insights, upcoming events & learn about data.world products.